Re: [amsat-bb] Local Noise on 2.4 GHZ

[Margaret Leber <maggie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 26 December 2001 01:56, Dan Schultz wrote in "Re: 
[amsat-bb] Local Noise on 2.4 GHZ":

> Does this rule that
> "protects" us have any teeth? Has anyone, anywhere (in the USA) ever
> gotten a part 15 user to discontinue operation of the device after
> reporting interference? 

Anybody who's ever dealt with an RFI situation in the *other* direction 
(licenced operation interfereing with Part 15 device) will discover 
what the popular *perception* of "what the FCC rules are" is. ("I 
bought these speakers at Best Buys; what do you mean I must accept 
intereference from your amateur transmitter?")

But the most difficult part may be locating the interfering device.
 
 73 de Maggie K3XS

-- 
-----/___.   _)   Margaret Stephanie Leber    / "The art of progress  /
----/(, /|  /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie   / consists of preserving/
---/   / | / |  _   _   _    `  _AOPA 925383/ order amid change and /
--/ ) /  |/  |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_  FN20hd / change amid order."   /
-/ (_/   '  K3XS  .-/ .-/    ARRL 39280   /___ --A.N.Whitehead ___/
/____ICQ 7161096_(_/_(_/__AMSAT 32844____/ <maggie@voicenet.com>

----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org