[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: Re: Re: AO40 Hiatus / sunangle
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Re: Re: Re: AO40 Hiatus / sunangle
- From: "Stacey E. Mills" <w4sm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 01:11:35 -0500
>The 11/5 message mentioned the offpointing, which did not surprise me
>when I read it at the time.
>
>But the ARRL article was the very first place I heard that the transponders
>would be shut down for the duration. This surprised me, since I assumed
>that the offpointing could be done by changing only the ALON and leaving
>the ALAT close to zero, so that the transponder could be operated for a
>brief but usable period during each orbit when the squint angle would
>be small enough.
The sun has to "pass" us. We can't simply change ALON unless we want to
chase the sun all around the ALON circle, which would take us a year
(almost) to get back to 0/0 and would force us to pass through 180/0 with
really horrible signals for several months. In order to maintain solar
power and sensors when the sun passes, we have to raise or lower
ALAT. Since the sun is now low on the ecliptic and is passing the back
(omni) side, it is easier to lower ALAT to maintain acceptable solar
angles. ALON will also be adjusted to minimize the ALAT change and
maximize our sensors.... Users of AO-13 will well remember similar
times. With AO-13, we went to the omni antennas during these times. With
AO-40, we have no omnis...... During these times, the passbands will be on
if the squint is reasonable, but there is no reason to have them active if
the squint is prohibitive. I had hoped to outline all of this in an
update for the amsat-bb last week, but my day job and the actual planning
of the events has kept me too busy. When we start the move, we'll outline
the plan and time line.
>BTW, the article also said:
>
> >The satellite is currently in a long period during which Earth
> >eclipses the sun near perigee--its point closest to Earth. AO-40
> >relies on solar panels for its power.
>
>The the perigee eclipse actually have a significant effect on
>the power budget? I thought this eclipse only lasted for about
>10% of the orbit.
The perigee eclipses will continue for many months but don't last very
long. Therefore, don't really affect the power budget, but they do affect
magnetorquing because without the sun, the sensors can't "despin" the
magnetoquers. So torquing is not as efficient, particularly when the
eclipse is right at perigee.
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Stacey E. Mills, W4SM WWW: http://www.cstone.net/~w4sm/ham1.html
Charlottesville, VA PGP key: http://www.cstone.net/~w4sm/key
_______________________________________________________________________
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home