[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Follow-up: DH 80cm dish and helix feedhorn
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Follow-up: DH 80cm dish and helix feedhorn
- From: Kc2hax@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 20:14:55 EDT
Hi Folks!
Had a beautiful Sunday afternoon/evening here in central Jersey paired with
an excellent AO-40 orbit. Ideal outdoors antenna testing conditions to check
the the 80 cm dish and helix feedhorn antenna with the TSI converter.
Signals were great and had real "armchair" copy. I guess conditions were in
general very good because most of the comments heard in the downlink were
about having very good reception. I was a bit surprised because of this very
good signals because I usually have better AO-40 reception when it is over
the Pacific than over the Atlantic, and this was an Atlantic orbit.
As said in my previous message I could not make a head to head comparison
with the BBQ, however I was able to compare the DH dish and feedhorn with my
small DSS dish (next project is helix cup for the DSS dish). Signals were
exactly and consistently 2 S units better with the 80 cm dish. At around
MA100, the beacon was S8 (Noise floor is S 0/1) with the DH dish and S6 with
the smaller DSS dish.
Here are the photos of the testing setup:
http://www.qsl.net/kc2hax/ant/deckrx.htm
Best 73 de antonio, kc2hax/ea4le
In a message dated 10/15/01 7:08:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Kc2hax writes:
> Hi Jerry et al.,
>
> Thanks for the kind comments. One of the best things of AO-40 is that it
is
> an
> excellent experimenting platform. It is giving us a lot of opportunities
> for continuos hands-on learning, the only problem is lack of spare time (or
> should I say that the spare time is the one we use in our other live
> ventures outside satellites) to address all that can be experimented.
>
> The other great thing with AO-40 is S band: 2.4 GHz is the ideal microwave
> entry level frequency, wavelength is small enough to really enjoy quick
> antenna experiments and big enough so accuracy is not a killer. Very well
> balanced indeed. And yeah... I have a large inventory of mode S spare
> antennas in the garage here in W2 and also in my EA QTH from the AO-13
days
> (Yes, I even did mode S patches also -with no succes at all- in the AO-13
> days)
> Re your proposal on additional testing requiered (btw, I was somewhat
> expecting this ;-)), It is going to be a bit difficult to make a fair
> comparison because it is not easy to mechanically setup the UEK on the
> Connifer focus in a way that could be properly compared with the TSI (the
> UEK
> has a very bad form factor to be in the focus of any dish). Testing the TSI
> with the 80cm dish and helix-cup feed is easy -this will be my next try-
> altough I will not have the side by side subjective comparison...
> In any case, next weekend time permitting (we are in the middle of the
> soccer and fall baseball season ;-)) will try it. Stay tuned.
> BTW, I received some requests for more detailed pictures and prepared a
> page with more graphic details here
> http://www.qsl.net/kc2hax/ant/feedhorn.htm
>
> Best 73 de antonio, kc2hax/ea4le
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home