[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Fw: Mars? Why not P3x in moon orbit...?

>From: Tony Langdon <tlangdon@atctraining.com.au>
>> Any package on the Moon will need some sort of perpetual 
>> power (meaning 
>> nuclear) or will have to be at one of the poles where the sun 
>> doesnt set and 
>> doesnt shine depending on where you are (ha).
>Well, if you could find a nice half lit, half shaded spot at one of the
>poles, things would be easier. :)
>> Otherwise it will experience the problems of the Apollo 11 
>> Alsep and the 
>> Pathfinder...when it gets cold and stays that way things die.
>I'd have expected that.  They put heaters on deep space probes for that
>reason. :)

Of course all this is "blue sky" talking ;-), since returning to the moon
isn't on NASA's plate right now...and for the next 20 years, either.  When
they do go back...to set up a manned base, lots has been written about
making the base below the surface to even-out the temperature extremes {and
avoid meteor falls}.  Communications would likely go there, too.  They
would probably use a combination solar-nuclear power plant for the base.

My read on libration is that it causes signal fluctuations over a few
seconds rather than days.  This is to eme signals so maybe that has much to
do with the lunar surface roughness.  I think a 10-degree bw antenna would
suffice given adequate tx power, thus fixed pointing.  Also in 30-40 years
obtaining 20-50w on 10 GHz should be easy...that's where it should operate;
keeps both lunar and terrestrial antenna sizes reasonable.  Better get
those kids into Amsat, so there will be hams around to work it!  Most
likely beyond my lifespan.


Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org