[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
RE: [AMSAT-bb] ao-40
- Subject: [amsat-bb] RE: [AMSAT-bb] ao-40
- From: Steve Jepsen <jepsen_st@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:23:46 -0000
Considering the width of the transponder, I don't think there's any
need for this kind of restriction.
Steve AI7W
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Richarz [SMTP:wricharz@infi.net]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 23:37
To: Drew Glasbrenner; amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ao-40
Maybe we could operate CW on the lower side of the beacon
and SSB on the upper side...or some such protocol.
de Bill, N4DH
At 23:51 7/21/01 -0400, Drew Glasbrenner wrote:
>This is not a criticism, but why is the beacon in the middle of the
>transponder? Wouldn't it make more sense for the beacon to be at the edge,
>outside of the passband like the RS and FO sats?
>
>Drew, KO4MA
>
> > at 0230z the 22nd of july, i was monitoring the beacon. i kept hearing
>people
> > swish the beacon. one person was whistling, another was sending cw taps.
> >
>
>
>----
>Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home