[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: FT-847 AO-40 and Doppler Uplink Correction?
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FT-847 AO-40 and Doppler Uplink Correction?
- From: "Jens H. Jensen" <topcat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 04:37:21 +0200
- In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010723044238.007a0100@mail.bigpond.com>
At 22:42 22-07-2001, you wrote:
>I hope this helps a bit.
Ok, Chris, but aren't you simplifying it a bit ?
What if we take the uplink as a reference:
Uplink frq = X (23cm)
Downlink frq = 2X (13cm)
Approximate frq's, without doppler, just for example!
Uplink at frequency X, doppler on uplink -10Khz (example!)
Uplink frq that the satellite sees : X - 10Khz Doppler
Transponder Inverting : receives 10Khz too low, becomes 10Khz too high on
downlink after inversion (at the sat, before doppler)
Downlink frq about 2X (example) + 10 Khz - 20Khz doppler (because downlink
frq twice as high)
Downlink frq that the uplinking/downlinking station sees/hears : 2X - 10Khz.
This will look (subjectively) as half the doppler, compared to a one-way
downlink (beacon).
Doppler subtracts here (subjectively, seen from the rx/tx station), as
opposed to an non-inverting transponder, where it would ADD. ??
I reckon this is the reason for the invention of the inverting transponder,
or are there other reasons?
Anyone more experienced have a comment?
73 de OZ1LRG
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home