Re: [amsat-bb] ArcJet Updates Etc

[Margaret Leber <maggie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 09 July 2001 22:13, Matt Donohoe wrote:

> I must ask, with the stuff that's gone "wrong" with AO-40.... Has
> AMSAT incorporated any new routines/regulations to prevent failures
> like those that have occured on AO-40 ?

Yes, I think we need definately need a "no failures" rule. Any 
satellite that has a failure should be returned immediately to the 
store where we bought it, before the warranty expires.  

After all, my airplane already has a "no crashing" placard... :-) 

 73 de Maggie K3XS

PS: Stacey, thanks for the update, and the fantastic job everybody on 
the team is doing. 

-- 
-----/___.   _)   Margaret Stephanie Leber    / "The art of progress  /
----/(, /|  /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie   / consists of preserving/
---/   / | / |  _   _   _    `  _AOPA 925383/ order amid change and /
--/ ) /  |/  |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_  FN20hd / change amid order."   /
-/ (_/   '  K3XS  .-/ .-/    ARRL 39280   /___ --A.N.Whitehead ___/
/____ICQ 7161096_(_/_(_/__AMSAT 32844____/ <maggie@voicenet.com>

----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org