[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: Dont want to work at it?
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Dont want to work at it?
- From: tlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Tony Langdon)
- Date: 11 Jun 01 09:27:30 +1000
Hello Robert!
10 Jun 01 13:45, you wrote to All:
RO> 2. Could the folks I know today who do the easy sats easily glue
RO> together a
RO> 2.4ghz station with no real test equipement etc. The answer is that a
RO> smaller percentage of folks will try then if there was a reasonable
RO> Mode B satellite. Witness the traffic on this bulliten board and you
Maybe. I've basically bypassed Mode B. Why? because the antenna requirements
are too extreme, but a 2' dish on 2.4 GHz is quite manageable, and mast head
converters will get rid of the cable problem.
I'm not a microwave engineer (far from it!), but the only way onto '40 is to
build, as commercially built solutions are too expensive. I've already managed
to get 2 "starter" projects working on these frequencies (an ATV exciter and a
2.4 GHz frequency multiplier, which will make a useful signal source) without
any hassles. I have a dish and some MMDS converters which I hope to cobble
into a useful AO-40 station.
As for experience, I had a lot of FM experience, but only a little linear
transponder experience (mostly RS-12/13), and less than 10 successful linear
QSOs (and all but one were prearranged - such is the level of linear
transponder activity in VK :( ). The jump direct to microwaves is a calculated
one, given my constraints.
RO> 3. How many folks have glued together your under 500 dollar stations
RO> have come straight from the FM sats (or no satellite experience at
Well, I will virtually be one, except for my little bit of testing on the
linear LEOs.
RO> all)? How many didnt have AO-10 or 13 or even other Mode B
RO> experience. I bet its not a large number adn if we want large numbers
I don't, and am not likely to for several years (can you say "antenna size"?).
RO> then the step is to hard. I know of exactly 1 and this is the home
RO> of
RO> JSC NASA and most of the hams here "work" at NASA in a technical mode.
You've just convinced me to push on, just to prove it _can_ be done by a ham
with limited resources and knowledge, a soldering iron and a desire to work the
bird! It won't happen overnight (even using my cheap approach, money is the
biggest limitation), but I will be on L/S (with U as a secondary uplink).
RO> In the end Woody if one is going to go up the learning scale then one
RO> has to do so in "leaps" that are doable by most of the student norm.
RO> Now the numbers who go up the scale "thin" as you get higher, but they
RO> drop off very very quickly the instant the step is so far that
RO> discouragement becomes a constant.
I think you do have a point though. However, I'm sure it will change as AO-40
becomes more popular. There will be more reasonably priced kits out.
Tony, VK3JED
.. The DISABLED: The only minority you can join.
--
|Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18
|Internet: tlang@freeway.apana.org.au
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home