RE: [amsat-bb] AMSAT has a SECRET: why not 10m instead of V band

[Tony Langdon <tlangdon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Use it as a LEO _downlink_... :-)

That way, the pirates are more likely to have problems, especially if
another SO-35 goes up!

Tony Langdon. 
Systems Development and Support. 
ATC Training Australasia.  Level 2 321 Exhibition St Melbourne  3000. 
Phone:  1300 13 1983     WWW:  http://www.atctraining.com.au 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike and Donna West [mailto:wl7bqm@gci.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2001 8:17
> To: Joel Kandel
> Cc: amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AMSAT has a SECRET: why not 10m instead of V
> band
> 
> 
> If what you say is true then why is it we want to give up on 
> the number one
> VHF band 144MHz.
> 
> Everyone is talking about how the pirates, cab drivers and 
> truckers have
> taken over the 144MHz. band.
> 
> Are you telling me that we hams don't use 144MHz. all over 
> the world and by
> using ALL the other bands no one will take them over????
> 
> I think you need to come up with something better than _USE 
> IT OR LOSE IT_
> cause "its not true" ......
> 
> de mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > Even of there's a user attrition rate directly proportional to the
> > satellite transmitter frequencies, we will lose those bands 
> entirely if
> > they are not used at all. It is incumbent on all of us to 
> do whatever we
> > can to get on the the higher frequencies, and this list 
> server can coach
> > those of us less technically talented.
> >
> > Remember 50 Mhz was deemed rocket science around WWII.
> >
> > Joel, KI4T
> 
> 
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
> 
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org