[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: cost comparisons
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] cost comparisons
- From: "Edward R. Cole" <al7eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 15:03:07 -0800
>Wayne replies:
>
>I suspect that the combination of an 18-element 70cm CP yagi, 1 meter
>crossboom, and a 54-element 13cm loop yagi is a SMALLER LOAD than the
>average TV antenna. It is entirely practical to use with cheap TV rotors.
## Ed: maybe but certainly TV rotors will do if unable to buy ham rotors!
>A 13cm receiving setup consisting of a 3-foot dish (or loop yagi), preamp,
>and surplus downconverter will COST LESS than the big yagi and preamp that
>most people used to receive the 2m downlink from AO10 and AO13. And that's
>not counting the fact that you can get away with much cheaper rotors.
## Ed: That was my point, too! Agreed.
>There seems to be nearly universal agreement that 2m is NOT a good band for
>high-orbit satellites or earth stations. Antennas are too big, spectrum is
>limited, noise is high, and there is too much legal and illegal interference
>beyond our control.
>
>70cm seems to be the BEST uplink band for the foreseeable future since
>transmitters are widely available, antenna size is reasonable, and cable
>loss is tolerable.
## Ed: An acceptable change-over compromise for entry-level microwave
operation. 23cm has advantages over 70cm. for uplink.
>
>I'm still not sure if 13 cm is the best downlink band. Antennas are cheap,
>small, and easy to steer with TV rotors. Surplus downconverters are cheap.
>Good preamps aren't really very expensive. But the signal is absorbed by
>trees, which is a problem for a lot of people. Also, interference from
>unlicensed wireless devices will be a growing problem over the next few
>years.
## Ed: This is really a shame: Legally Licensed operations interfered
with by unlicensed equipment...and we will not win this one!
>Too band 23cm isn't a permissible downlink band. It probably would have
>been the great downlink band from the perspective of antenna size and tree
>absorption. Is 10 GHz less affected by trees than 2.4 GHz?
## Ed: Sorry, trees increasingly block radiation as you go above 1 GHz.
However, gain of a dish goes up by the square of frequency change, so
dishes can be smaller at 10 GHz depending on the satellite signal
requirements. The 18 inch DSS dish is almost a standard for microwaver
rovers [gain = 35 dBi]. So easier on your tower tops!
Ed
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home