[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Expected noise results with Drake converter (no satellite.)
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Expected noise results with Drake converter (no satellite.)
- From: "Edward R. Cole" <al7eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 11:17:08 -0800
Sorry,
I forgot to state Mike is using a Drake with 144 Mhz IF, with IF coils/caps
removed; no other mods. Mike has used this for a couple years cutting his
teeth on receiving the UO-11 beacon...whew! AO-40 is much stronger!
Ed
>From: "Mark L. Hammond" <hammond@surrealnet.net>
>>I was visiting the qth of my freind Mike, WL7BQM, and his Meyers dish [~24
>>dB] dipole combo, Conifer preamp [NF?], Rg-6 coax, FT-736R is doing
>>fantastically well. We heard the beacon from 25 to 35 dB above the noise.
>>He has 100% copy on the TLM with ao40Rcv. We had fun working a few
stations.
>
>What downconverter was WL7BQM using?
>
>>So folks, there is theory and there is reality.
>>
>>I'm back to the "drawing board" and the bench. Waiting for my Kuhne
>>preamp. Looking at setting up a 4-foot dish. Wondering why the little
>>dish performed over 35 dB down from Mike's system? As they say...stay
>>tuned for future developments.
>>
>>Ed
>
>Hang in there...I'm convinced a low noise preamp is going to be very
>important for those of us using any type of "converted
>downconverter". Using that nifty Exel spreadsheet has helped with my own
>analysis.
>
>73,
>
>
>
>Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home