[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: S-band receiving requirements
At 11:04 AM 5/17/2001 , you wrote:
>I think I now understand why so many of us had unrealistic expectations
>about our S-band receiving systems. It boils down to a series a cascaded
>assumptions that were incorrect.
>
>Many of us discovered through trial and error that "pre-launch example"
>S-band receiving setups are woefully inadequate for reception of the
>existing spin-stabilized S2 transponder. More uplink power will result in
>a readable downlink signal, but a higher authority has (correctly) decided
>for us that the solution must be to use receiving setups that are
>significantly better than the pre-launch examples.
>
>It remains to be seen if "pre-launch example" receiving setups will be
>adequate part of the time with the final satellite configuration. Squint
>near perigee will improve dramatically if 3-axis stabilization is
>successful. There may be seasonal periods when the S1 antenna can be used
>for a portion of each orbit. It is certain, however, that RELIABLE S-band
>reception requires a SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER receiving system than the
>"pre-launch examples".
>
>In retrospect, the only thing that mystifies me is why today's "alligator
>critics" were SILENT when months of amsat-bb traffic was dominated by
>discussions about building helixes, modifying surplus converters,
>etc. One or more of these silent experts should have spoken up to explain
>why those setups won't be good enough. Then for the last few weeks the
>experts remained silent when several people reported modest success
>hearing the Middle Beacon. Again, the experts should have pointed out
>that we need to hear much weaker signals than the Middle Beacon. The
>"alligator critics" are vocal now, but they were strangely silent when
>their advice would have been most helpful.
From what I have been reading ... unless the situation with AO-40
drastically improves (hopefully by changing [improving] its orbit and
deploying the solar panels for more transmit power on S band), that AO-40
will NOT be an "easy sat" for beginner hams to work. But it will still be
possible to work.
W4SCO
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home