[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Suitability of FT817 for satellites
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Suitability of FT817 for satellites
- From: "Edward R. Cole" <al7eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 16:30:54 -0800
Jens, ZL2TJT:
I just returned from vacationing in the eastern USA where I used my FT-817
with an Arrow on UO-14 at 5w FM. I have programmed the radio for five
split-freq. channels for tracking doppler and it is working fine even
though unable to hear my own signal in the downlink [the radio doesnot
operate duplex]. For this type of sat operation I can recommend it well.
I even heard UO-14 just using a 1/4 wavelength mobile whip and worked
VE3FZI from Michigan. WA1ECF and WA7EF? were worked using the Arrow. Only
problem was QRM.
For operation on linear translator birds such as AO-40, RS-12, or FO-29,
the lack of duplex will be problem-some without software doppler tuning
control. With sw to control uplink freq. I think the radio would be fine
for these sats, too. Recent discussion has covered this.
You would need more than 5w for AO-40 on mode U/S, and for FO-29. Probably
need a small yagi for RS-12 at 5w. I haven't tried mode-A, yet, b ut
think maybe the Arrow would suffice for the uplink and a 10m dipole for
receiving.
Sunday I made my first 10 GHz 10mw ssb contact over a 12 mile path using
the FT-817 on 144 MHz IF. IWorked both WW8M and NE8I on 3 cm in Michigan.
Its becoming very fun to use ;-)
Ed
>Hi all,
>I wonder if any of you have tried the Yaesu FT817
>or Icom IC910H (+UX910) for satellite use.
>Are they useful or even good ?
>(My old UHF rig is getting more unreliable than the weather.)
>73 Jens ZL2TJT
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home