[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: AO40 downlink signal strength
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO40 downlink signal strength
- From: Ed Krome <71611.76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 22:48:15 -0400
Message text written by INTERNET:nx7u@arrl.net
>
Is this an accurate synopsis of the situation? Is it possible that
"easy to get on mode-S downlink" is that suboptimum?
I'm not trying to ruffle feathers here, but these thoughts are what so
far have paralyzed my efforts to get mode S going. <
-------
Don't be paralyzed! My little survey of first day AO40 users yielded a
surprising number of unmodified Drakes (~3+ db NF) parked behind barbeque
grill dishes that did just fine. Yes, the UEK3000SAT is a tiger and there
were a few behind tiny 16 turn helix's. But there were a LOT of Drakes,
Transystems, DEMI's, homebrews, oddballs, what have you.
As the commercial says "just do it".
Ed K9EK
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home