[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Frame merge [was: AO-40 Telemetry Required]



Paul Willmott wrote:


> We can reconstruct good CRCC blocks from bad ones using a majority-voting
> bit merge technique.

Very cool. What a good idea! Wish I'd thought of it.

Oh, wait a minute...

Maggie Leber wrote on 2 Feb 2001:

> Funny, I was just speculating to myself the other day while watching Bob's
> stream from the 40' dish hit the server, that while it was noisy, that I bet
> that
>
>  1) The noise wasn't in the same places in every block and...
>
>  2)  Two of the same kind of block recieved close together in time were probably
>  mostly the same data so...
>
>  3)  ...if you lined up a bunch of like frames from roughly the same period of
> time and took a majority vote on the contents of each byte, you could probably
> build up a synthetic dataset that might not be 100% but was likely pretty close
> to what was originally sent.
 >

> I can't be the first one to think of that either.

OK, folks...was it really my idea?

I definately will admit to having been too lazy/buzy to actually write 
it...:-)
73 de Maggie K3XS

-- 
-----/___.   _)   Margaret Stephanie Leber    / "The art of progress  /
----/(, /|  /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie   / consists of preserving/
---/   / | / |  _   _   _    `  _AOPA 925383/ order amid change and /
--/ ) /  |/  |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_  FN20hd / change amid order."   /
-/ (_/   '  K3XS  .-/ .-/    ARRL 39280   /___ --A.N.Whitehead ___/
/____ICQ 7161096_(_/_(_/__AMSAT 32844____/ <maggie@voicenet.com>


----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home