[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Helix feed for dish

Lee and Joe,

I'll just make a couple replies to you both here on the -bb.  My guess is
there are some "arm-chair" readers out there following the topic, also.  My
replies inserted with ***before them ;-)

>From: Joseph Murray <k0vty@juno.com>
>Hi Ed
>>From Kraus:
>The number of turns required for the helix feed antenna depends on beam
>width desired.

***Yes, this is obvious; I suppose this comment was for general distribution.

>For the pattern to be 10 dB down at the edge of the parabolic dish
>reflector ,  the 
>required number of turns is approximetly given by:
>     n ~ 8400 / ( BW ( deg ) required, squared ) times turns spacing in

***That is new to me...guess I need to buy a copy of "Antennas".

>Thus    8400 / ( 0.21 ( 14 degree pitch ))   times ( 115 (deg  required
>BW)  ^ 2)
>8400/ (  0.21 * 13225 )  = 3 turns

***The solution for an angle of 115 degrees.  
***So if I want 71 degrees:  8400/{0.21*(71)^2} = 7.9 turns, or
***For Lee: 8400/{0.21*(90)^2} = 4.9 turns 

***Now lets compare these results with those from the
***W1GHZ (ex N1BWT) formula that Lee found.
***For a -10 dB illumination angle of 115 degrees:  
***HPBW(feed) = A*SQRT(3/taper) =115*SQRT(3/10) = 62.9 degrees
***For a -10 dB illumination angle of 90 degrees:  
***HPBW(feed) = A*SQRT(3/taper) =90*SQRT(3/10) = 49.3 degrees
***For a -10 dB illumination angle of 71 degrees:  
***HPBW(feed) = A*SQRT(3/taper) =71*SQRT(3/10) = 38.8 degrees
***Now to arrive at the number of turns, you would need to 
***convert HPBW into gain and solve the reverse formula for finding 
***gain from number of turns.  Hopefully you would arrive with Kraus'
***formula provided by Joe.  

***In fact the 5-turn helix I modeled has a HPBW = 59 deg. and 
***-10 dB BW of 99 deg.  Falling somewhere between the two formula.
***This is the dilemma of all antenna development, coming up 
***with formula that accurately model reality.

>Remember I told you about the pitch spacing adjustment to fit -10 dB down
>at the edge of the dish.

***This presupposes either you can measure the antenna pattern or 
***have software to analyze effects of changing the pitch angle.
***In a practical sense though, the helix pitch could be adjusted for max
***signal into the dish while observing a stable far-field signal source or
using sun noise.

>Most formula for helix seem always are for max gain.   In the dish feed
>gain is not the driver .   BW is .

***Yes, I am aware of this.  I only stated dish gain, 
***since this is of interest for path-link analysis.  
***Feed gain is not of particular interest except as 
***it pertains to illumination angle [i.e. feed directivity].

>This is the Kraus method.

***Good info, thanks!

>I have not dealt with offset feeds as you,  so I don't know if offset and
>non offset respond the same.
>Another thing  ,  The above  is good for transmit in non offset dish
>feeds but have no idea about transmit on offset dishes.     The need to
>have zero phase difference across the aperture in transmit makes things
>Joe  k0VTY

***PS: I'm not the expert on offset antennas.  Actually in ham radio 
***circles Paul Wade, W1GHZ, is.  Lee gave the link to 
***Paul's on-line antenna primer where he discusses offset dishes 
***as well as many other microwave antennas.
***Paul is widely published on antenna subjects: 
***QST, QEX, Microwave Update Proceedings for example.


Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org