[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Spacefraft Aerodynamics [was:Re:AO-40: Plans for April-June 2001]
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Spacefraft Aerodynamics [was:Re:AO-40: Plans for April-June 2001]
- From: Margaret Leber <maggie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 18:58:00 -0400
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010119
Tony Langdon wrote:
> Quite likely, the exact amount of drag would have had to have been taken
> into account, that's for sure.
Looking at my P3D model, it's pretty clear that it's *not*
aerodynamically symmetrical as ALON changes. It loks to me like any drag
forces caused by the (relatively) turbulent flow on the +Z face would be
unbalanced by the (relatively) laminar flow on the -Z face.
So when changing the ALON it may actually be easier to go in one
direction than the other if it takes the +Z face though the low-pressure
zone "behind" the bird where the dragginess of all the stuff on that
side is less important.
Who would have thought that wind tunnel studies of a satellite would be
useful? :-)
73 de Maggie K3XS
--
-----/___. _) Margaret Stephanie Leber / "The art of progress /
----/(, /| /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie / consists of preserving/
---/ / | / | _ _ _ ` _AOPA 925383/ order amid change and /
--/ ) / |/ |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_ FN20hd / change amid order." /
-/ (_/ ' K3XS .-/ .-/ ARRL 39280 /___ --A.N.Whitehead ___/
/____ICQ 7161096_(_/_(_/__AMSAT 32844____/ <maggie@voicenet.com>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home