[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
nuclear satellites Was: MIR question
- Subject: [amsat-bb] nuclear satellites Was: MIR question
- From: The Roschewsks <bangzoom@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 09:16:23 -0500
COSMOS-954 was a Soviet spy powered by a nuclear reactor fueled with
radioactive uranium. It crashed in Canada on January 24, 1978.
reference:
http://www.aticourses.com/news/encount.htm
http://www.ucalgary.ca/MG/inrm/industry/space/environ.htm
--> Rob
ka2pbt
- ----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:42:03 -0000
From: "John Stephensen, KD6OZH" <kd6ozh@gte.net>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] MIR question
As far as I know, all of the nuclear-powered spacecraft have been sent on
interplanetary missions and were not even in a temporary orbit around earth.
Solar power is too inefficient once you get past Mars.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Cole" <n7bfs@qwest.net>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Friday, 23 March 2001 21:18 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] MIR question
> Me and my buddy were talking about the fallout of MIR yesterday and he
> brought up the subject of Nuclear reactor parts raining down on us and
> that there are many nuke powered satellites up in orbit .
>
> So my question is can anyone lend some credence to this statement , I
> was unaware that there was any nuke power plants in orbit , I thought I
> recall a thread about this a few years back and that it was not so ...
>
> I would be kinda worried about orbiting nuke plants in the sky ( let
> alone on the ground in my own state ).
>
> Someone please enlighten me :^}
> --
> Douglas Cole N7BFS
> AMSAT#26182 , K2 # 544
> http://www.users.qwest.net/~cdoug3
> Registered Linux user # 188922
> ----
--
bangzoom@usa.com
http://www.im.att.net/ AT&T IM Anywhere
handle: lisa
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home