[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
2.4 Ghz Antenna Bridge
- Subject: [amsat-bb] 2.4 Ghz Antenna Bridge
- From: Jesse Morris <w4mvb@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:50:06 est
Good Afternoon,
I'm still going through some growing pains with my antenna bridge.
Because I had some intermittent problems with the only double male "N"
connector I did all my previous tests with a jury rigged adapter of 2
"BNC" to "N" adapter and a double male "BNC". Everything looked good
with it when I tested the terminators I have so I used it for all my
previous antenna adjustments. I did order a new double male "N"
connector however, and when it came last week when I tested the antenna
with the fiberglass supports it did not look as good with it as it had
with my make shift adapter. As a result I adjusted the grounded link
spacing to the reflector for a null in the bridge with the new connector
and it came out to be about 1/8 inch. The strange thing is that when I
went back to my make shift adapter it too indicated a good null on the
bridge. I wont try to explain that because I don't understand it except
to say that the initial difference was not very great and a receiving
test with this antenna compared with PVC antenna with 1/4 inch spacing
showed no difference in signal strength.
At the suggestion of John, G7HIA I did a "rain test" on the two antennas.
Specifically we wanted to know if water on the PVC would degrade that
antenna as compared with the one with open supports. When I turned the
hose on the PVC antenna the signal dropped about 2 "S" units but
recovered to normal as soon as I turned the water off. When I turned the
water on the antenna with the open supports the signal dropped several
"S" units and did not recover when I turned the water off! I discovered
that the signal strength did not return until I blew the water off the
matching link. I repeated the test on both antennas several times and
the results were always the same. Water droplets on the close spaced
link apparently de-tune it much more than on the wide spaced link.
Even though the close spacing may (I repeat - MAY) be a better match the
wide spacing might be a better approach for wet weather. I did not
perform this test on antennas with the conventional feed but I have no
doubt the same factors will apply.
73 de Jess - W4MVB
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home