[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: XML and radio
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: XML and radio
- From: "Margaret Leber (K3XS)" <maggie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:40:33 -0500
"Kevin Muenzler, WB5RUE" wrote:
> Why not use something that is more standardized and works uniformly cross
> platforms/OS?
Well, first off, I'm writing this software to please *me*, not some "target
market"--probably a classic example of Eric Raymond's "software written to
scratch a developer's itch".
But since I'm writing in Java, I'm really not expecting portability to be an
issue. The code I sometimes compile on NT runs just fine in Linux. Platform
dependencies are pretty well encapsulated to the calls that do the serial I/O.
In my shack, serial I/O (I have the luxury of a 16-port serial
board--*wonderful* for a shack computer) is just part of the filesystem. Any
Windows portations will only need to replace the streams that currently connect
to /dev/cuxxx in the filesystem with equivalant streams from javax.comm.comport.
But I don't have to mess with that right now because...OK, OK, I won't go there.
> How do you like your 847? I'm getting ready to make the big purchase soon.
> I wish it had an internal tuner like the 890. What I DO like about it is
> separate antenna connections for HF/6m/2m/70cm -- NO DUPLEXERS!
The 847 is very cool. As an economical solution for someone who wanted to be
active in a *lot* of modes/bands it was nearly ideal, at the time I bought it in
anticipation of getting my General...almost a year ago now.
The functionality of the CAT interface is disappointing to me; why on earth you
would design such an interface without a command equivalant to every button on
the front panel, I have no idea. But I do intend to make the most of what
function is there.
The HF section is servicable, considering that this is not a dedicated HF
DX/contesting radio, but I understood that at the time I bought it. The lack of
an internal tuner is not often felt--Yaesu obviously wanted one autotuner to
serve across the product line. I have an LDG Electronic autotuner in the HF
stream and it does the job,, considering it has only one memory. Since we switch
antennas here a lot (having two HF stations in the household and a shared
antenna farm) individual band memories wouldn't help a lot anyhow.
My lifepartner Gwennie NG3P has an internal autotuner in her new ICOM 748 and
loves it a lot. That radio shows me what an equivalant amount of cash focused on
HF performance only (OK, it has a 6m/2m section, I know) can accomplish.
Wonderful box, and she lets me use it....so ICOM support will probably show up
in JHamTune next. I'll have to deal with javax.comm then too, because *her*
shack computer runs Win98. I'm hoping to keep the class factoring clean so I can
implement remote operation someday. :0)
All in all, not a disappointment at all for someone who previously only had two
HTs and a dual-band mobile. And when I ultimately replace it with something
spiffier down the road, I have the mobile bracket for it in storage... :-)
73 de Maggie K3XS
--
-----/___. _) Margaret Stephanie Leber / "The art of progress /
----/(, /| /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie / consists of preserving/
---/ / | / | _ _ _ ` _AOPA 925383/ order amid change and /
--/ ) / |/ |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_ FN20hd / change amid order." /
-/ (_/ ' K3XS .-/ .-/ ARRL 39280 /___ --A.N.Whitehead ___/
/____ICQ 7161096_(_/_(_/__AMSAT 32844____/ <maggie@voicenet.com>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home