[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: I demand a recount!



Doug,

I've not tried the IZ8BLY program, I looked at the blurb on the web site,
but in order to get capture files in Archive Format, I have to set it up to
send to P3T via TCP/IP, ... which seems a bit around the houses. The regular
save format of the program is incompatible with the archive, ... which is a
shame because it wouldn't take long to fix.

But anyway the AO40RCV program is real easy to use, and it works, AND saves
logs in the correct format for the archive, ... it will be interesting when
the other features are added.

Cheers
Paul, VP9MU

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Braun NA1DB [mailto:na1db@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:57 PM
To: paul.willmott@omsl.bm
Subject: RE: I demand a recount!


I was originally using the demodulator program for the EVM, but
it needs more work.  I also tried the IZ8BLY program, but I found
it a bit clumsy to use.

Doug

At 10:56 AM 1/22/01 , you wrote:
>That's sounds like plenty of room to move in, ... I was running on my
400MHz
>PII today, ... I'll set it up on my Pentium Pro 200 as see if it still
>works, ... I'd like to try out the auto-doppler feature, but my main
>computer has both COM ports in use, ... if it works on the P-Pro 200 then I
>can use those com ports.
>
>Did you try any other software before settling on the AO40RCV?
>
>Cheers
>Paul
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Doug Braun NA1DB [mailto:na1db@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:01 PM
>To: paul.willmott@omsl.bm
>Subject: RE: I demand a recount!
>
>
>The resource meter on my 133 M Hz Pentium says about 20% CPU
>utilization, so I bet any Pentium or 75-100 MHz 486 would work.
>
>Doug
>
>
>
>At 10:18 AM 1/22/01 , you wrote:
> >Hi Doug,
> >
> >The counts were for MY capture, ... not what the end result was <grin>...
> >also I had to break to go to work so I maybe could have got some more
> >anyway, I stopped at MA13, ... I can usually capture until MA19 with the
> >hardware, but I have to tune manually at that part of the orbit.
> >
> >Neat program, I'll continue running them side by side to see if I can
track
> >down what the hardware is doing different to the software, then feed the
> >info back to Moe.
> >
> >Enough to say that I won't be buying another hardware demod for when we
get
> >2 beacons on at once, .... I winder what is the minimum spec machine for
> >running the software?
> >
> >Cheers
> >Paul, VP9MU
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Doug Braun NA1DB [mailto:na1db@yahoo.com]
> >Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 11:15 AM
> >To: paul.willmott@omsl.bm
> >Subject: I demand a recount!
> >
> >
> >I got 49 good blocks with AO40 RCV!
> >    
> >BTW, my observations of the changes in signal quality vs. MA are
> >exactly the same as yours.
> >
> >Doug
> >NA1DB
> >
> >At 08:40 AM 1/22/01 , you wrote:
> > >Hi All,
> > >
> > >This morning I ran both the AO40RCV software demodulator and my G3RUH
> > >Hardware demodulator at the same time from the same audio source, ....
>the
> > >hardware won by only 3 CRCC OK blocks!
> > >
> > >Total scores:
> > >AO40RCV: 45 CRCC OK out of 115 received
> > >G3RUH: 48 CRCC OK out of 121 received
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com 
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com 


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home