[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

*Subject*: Re: [amsat-bb] Formula for antenna polarization loss*From*: K5OE@xxxxxxx*Date*: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:33:38 EST

Chris, You can deduce the formulae required for the various theoretical combinations from the descriptions on 9-6 and Table 9.1 on page 9-7. The only combination not provided is LP to LP, opposite sense, which is identical to Type 5 Link, with infinite attenuation. Effectively, the formula is a linear function with a slope of 1 and an intercept of 0, where the zero point (0,0) is infinite attenuation from opposite polarity (either LP-LP or CP-CP) and the 100 % point (call it 100,100) is matched polarity (either LP-LP or CP-CP). For example, when comparing the signal level of a CP wave on a LP antenna (any orientation), the value of the signal (integration of the area under the curve) is halfway between 0 and 100, or 50: -3 dB from the maximum "matched" combination. This would be exactly the same scenario if you took a perfectly vertical signal and received it on an antenna at 45 degrees. Take that same antenna and move it down to 22.5 degrees and you will have half again as much signal (-6 dB). Move it to 11.25 degrees and you will be -9 dB. Move it to 9 degrees (10 % of the "matched" orientation) and you will be -10 dB. If you can define the percentage of polarization offset (LP) or ellipticity (CP), you can simply apply it as a linear ratio to the 100 % value and then take the log conversion for dB. OK? Again, these are theoretical concepts and really have little in common with everyday satellite groundstation operation. I have never observed any satellite signal that is constant in polarity or orientation for very long. As real-world observations, high-gain LP and fixed-CP antennas "see" enough of the ellipticity in satellite downlinks to hear them even when greatly mismatched in polarity or orientation. Changing CP is most valuable when doing weak-signal work, such as AO-10, or when the antenna is very small and at the margin for effective communications. A perfect example of this is the fading common in omnidirectional CP antennas, like eggbeaters and QHA's. When the satellite CP favors them, they hear very well, but when it changes to the opposite polarity (typically several times a pass for the LEO's), they lose the signal because they do not have enough gain to get an acceptable S/N ratio from the ellipticity error in the satellite downlink. Theory says the attenuation is infinite, but practical observation says it is more like -20 to -30 dB. Sorry for so long ... hope this helps, 73, Jerry, K5OE > Thanks for the reply Jerry, > > > K2UBC's "The Radio Amateur's Satellite Handbook," ARRL, 1998, 9-4 - 9-13. > > Unfortunately, I have this manual and the above pages do not give any > formula. > > > "The ARRL Antenna Book," ARRL, 1991, 19-19 - 19-10. > > Does this manual have the formula? If so I will go out and purchase it > pronto! > > Thanks > > Christopher Cox > ---- Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA. To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

- Prev by Date:
**Re: ARRL Handbook at B&N** - Next by Date:
**Re: elevation screw jack** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Formula for antenna polarization loss** - Next by thread:
**Re: Formula for antenna polarization loss** - Index(es):