[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: S-Band Antenna Comparisons, etc.
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] S-Band Antenna Comparisons, etc.
- From: Joseph V Murray <k0vty@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:19:58 CST
Hi Jon
If you have a copy of "Antennas" 2nd by John Kraus, On page 282 there
is a picture of a helical antenna. It has a flat circular open grid
ground plane . The statement by Kraus is " Note that the open grid
of the ground plane has both circular and radial conductors. Both are
essential. "
I chose to add a ground plane for a helix to the parabolic case for what
is essential for circular polarization . The dish or the ground plane
have to have conductors mounted correctly . The opposite is also
important for the case where a dish is required for linear polarization
so that a reduction of all other polarizations can be managed by building
the dish with no circular conductors.
Placing a linear dipole feed antenna on a linear wire dish ( Bar-B-Que)
where the polarity of the dipole is counter to the wires in the dish will
indicate much less functionality.
Taking a linear dish with a correctly aligned Linear feed and rotating
the dish for the purpose of detecting polarization is very positive.
Kraus has more recently removed the flat solid ( or flat open grid )
ground plane and added a one turn or a two turn loop ground plane for
the typical axial mode helical form . The single turn is close to the
first turn feed point of the helix and the second reflector is mounted
1/3 to 1/2 WL from the feed point.
Another point for you folks with these antennas. The only way to check
VSWR on a feed antenna is when it is mounted properly at the dish focal
point . The refractive index of the dish surface changes the VSWR of
the feed antenna if it is not mounted first.
R
Joe K0VTY
=======================
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 07:16:17 -0600 Jon Ogden <na9d@mindspring.com>
writes:
>on 1/7/01 11:10 PM, Joseph V Murray at k0vty@juno.com wrote:
>
>> Circular polarization requires a solid dish surface.
>
>I really have a hard time with this. As Dave pointed out the surface
>is
>seen by the RF signal as a solid, not the grate that we see.
>
>Now I will admit that a parabolic section will tend to pick up signals
>in
>the plane its laying in so that would make it look more horizontal or
>vertical depending on how its placed. But I would think that if you
>have a
>full parabolic dish made up of a grate of rods that it should not
>matter
>which direction they run.
>
>73,
>
>Jon
>NA9D
>
>-------------------------------------
>Jon Ogden
>NA9D (ex: KE9NA)
>
>Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA
>
>http://www.qsl.net/ke9na
>
>"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home