[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: [sarex] ISS Transmissions
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: [sarex] ISS Transmissions
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:16:18 +1100
- In-Reply-To: <B6702578.BAE7%na9d@mindspring.com>; from na9d@mindspring.com on Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:02:16PM -0600
- Mail-Followup-To: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>, amsat-bb@amsat.org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:02:16PM -0600, Jon Ogden wrote:
> That is true. But at the same time it creates a potential mess. What
> happens if we get this thing built and two of the involved parties go to
> war? It kind of reminds me of the possible scenario that took place in the
> movie 2010.
Good question. Hopefully the ISS might help to avoid a war between
Russia and the USA. It seems very unlikely these days (although
that could change within 10 years).
> Necessity is the mother of invention. We've not needed such a craft. The
> Russians did.
Without the Russians, resupply of the ISS would be costing a bunch more
then. I wonder how much a Progress flight costs (given that the vehicle
is not reusable) compared to a shuttle mission? So I think this is a big
positive for Russian involvement -- resupply missions will always be needed.
Unfortunately, Australia is not involved at all, which is pretty poor.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home