[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: [sarex] ISS Transmissions
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: [sarex] ISS Transmissions
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:28:28 +1100
- In-Reply-To: <B66FABEA.BA91%na9d@mindspring.com>; from na9d@mindspring.com on Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:23:39PM -0600
- Mail-Followup-To: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>, amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:23:39PM -0600, Jon Ogden wrote:
> It is scary to think that at least for now, the major components of the
> station are built on Russian technology. I wish we would have stuck with
> Ronald Reagan's plan for the space station: build it ourselves. But to
> undertake a project like this by ourselves and for ourselves would not have
> been politically correct, would it? Who cares about cost. The Russians
> have no money and we are basically footing the bill anyhow. We could do it
> better, faster, cheaper here.
Maybe, but you can't be sure of that. No doubt there are some politics
involved too. Peace is not a bad goal, though.
> I don't mean to insult any Russian friends who may be on the BB. Far from
> that. I think it is amazing how much they have done with nothing, but it is
> not first rate Western technology either.
I notice that all of the unmanned resupply ships going to ISS are Russian
Progress vehicles. Where is the USA's equivalent, and why isn't it being used?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home