[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Geosynchronous Satellites

>I think that proves it.

Proves what?

The only formula relevant to the original discussion of LEO vs
geostationary/Molniya is the inverse square law, and you got that

So here's the bottom line. Every time you double the distance, the
path loss increases by 6 dB. So going from a typical LEO path of 2,000
km to a typical geostationary/Molniya path of 40,000 km increases the
path loss by 26 dB. That's a power ratio of 400:1.  I'd say that's a
pretty significant consideration in any discussion of the relative
merits of LEOs and high altitude satellites.


Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org