[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: New AO-27?



Sco,

The reason you havn't heard why it can't be done is because technically it can
be done.

What everyone is saying is that it doesn't make sense to do it. There's a
difference between technical feasability and functional usefullness.

Ted

sco@sco-inc.com wrote:

>
> No one has told me yet why it can not be done. Several have said that it
> couldn't be done for what amounts to POLITICAL REASONS ... but not to
> physical & technical reasons why it can't be done.
> Tell DirectTV that it can't be done.
>
> If Amsat-NA wanted to build a bird [FM or SSB/CW or Digital] and put it
> into a geo-stationary orbit over the USA and had the money and expertise to
> do so, tell me why it can NOT be done.
>
> I never said that such a bird should be the only project in the future. I
> also see the need for world-wide sats, especially if AO-40 is lost.
>
> W4SCO
>
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

--
Ted Cross (N0IAK & G0HHY)
n0iak@amsat.org
ICQ: 16040894


----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home