[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Analysis of AO-40 Telemetry From BipropellantEngine Burn Attempts
on 12/21/00 12:23 PM, Phil Karn at karn@ka9q.net wrote:
>> rises from 0 to 15.6 Bar. Also the helium tank pressure may have
>> cooled from 10.7 to 8.1 C. (This may also be due to 'stirring' of
>> tank contents caused by acceleration.) Later indications from
>
> No, just think of "adiabatic expansion".
>
> AO-10 was never able to do a second burn because the helium bottle
> lost pressure after the first burn. The theory was that during the
> first burn, which went long because of a wiring error in the LIU,
> adiabatic expansion cooled the helium bottle enough for differential
> contraction of the bottle cap to lose its seal, allowing the helium to
> escape.
Phil,
I thought AO-10 had its problems because it collided with the launcher
vehicle this damaging the engine.
Jon
-------------------------------------
Jon Ogden
NA9D (ex: KE9NA)
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA
http://www.qsl.net/ke9na
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home