[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Amateur radio module on commercial Geo Sat?
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Amateur radio module on commercial Geo Sat?
- From: tlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Tony Langdon)
- Date: 20 Dec 00 20:21:39 +1000
Hello Phil!
19 Dec 00 22:18, you wrote to All:
PK> antennas. That's one of the reasons Qualcomm invented IS-95 CDMA.
PK>
PK> Things are different in a single-beam satellite environment with
PK> directional antennas on the ground. You don't have significant
PK> interference from other satellites on the downlink or from users of
PK> other satellites on the uplink. Each user on a given satellite
PK> adjusts their uplink timing so that everybody arrives at the right
PK> time at the satellite. Once that happens, it doesn't matter that there
PK> are different propagation delays to the various stations on the
PK> downlink, as all the signals coming out of the satellite are delayed
PK> together by the different propagation delays.
OK, I get the general gist of the idea. There's still a few details to be
resolved in my mind, but the basic idea makes sense.
On the microwave bands, the assumption that the ground station is using a beam
antenna would be indeed valid, may not apply on lower frequencies, depending on
the details (but since we're talking about 1,2 and 2.4 GHz, this is a moot
point.
PK> My thinking is that the satellite would periodically inject a frame of
PK> telemetry into the transponder, and this frame would serve as the
PK> timing reference for the uplink transmissions. The individual stations
PK> would adjust for the uplink delay from the satellite orbital elements
PK> and the known station location. The satellite could broadcast its own
PK> orbital elements as part of the telemetry message, just as GPS does.
PK> The ground station location could be entered manually by the user, or
PK> determined automatically from a GPS receiver. The GPS receiver would
PK> also provide time for the accurate propagation of the orbital
PK> elements.
So, basically a case of using GPS to measure positional differences and time
delays? These days, quite feasible, given the lowish cost of surplus GPS
engines that can be obtained from time to time.
Interesting idea all round.
Tony, VK3JED
.. Mr Worf, scan that ship." "Aye, Captain ... at 300 DPI ?
--
|Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18
|Internet: tlang@freeway.apana.org.au
|
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home