[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: AO-40 info from AMSAT-UK
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-40 info from AMSAT-UK
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:20:47 +1100
- In-Reply-To: <B662F45D.B431%na9d@mindspring.com>; from na9d@mindspring.com on Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 10:53:18PM -0600
- Mail-Followup-To: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>, amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 10:53:18PM -0600, Jon Ogden wrote:
> No, I don't think that's correct. Peter says it is a "fail-safe" system.
> Fail-safe by definition means there is redundancy built in. Additionally,
Peter did also say that there is a software watchdog, but no hardware
watchdog. I don't understand how a software watchdog can be fail-safe;
for that matter, a hardware one can't either but it is less likely
to fail I should think.
> My President is George W. Bush -> The legal winner in Florida
Do you think you could keep your politics for an appropriate forum?
Hamish (electronics engineer)
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home