[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: amsat-dl statement


Thank you for the informative note.  Keep up the good work.  That goes for
all the control stations and people working on the problem.  We're behind
you 100 percent.

Sincerely and 73s,
Michael Kingery
Dothan, Alabama

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Guelzow" <Peter.Guelzow@arcormail.de>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] amsat-dl statement

> Jon Ogden wrote:
> > If the computer has completely crashed, there is no
> > battery regulation or charging control, etc.
> The BCR does not need the IHU to regulate or control charging. The
> IHU is only used for optimizing the battery set-point and solar array
> offset voltage to get *maximum* efficiency..
> > Again, flame me if you want, but it's a little difficult to hear the
> > designers of the craft telling us that it will reset itself but that
> > just don't know when.  Huh?  They designed the circuits with certain
> > parameters.  I don't know, I am just bummed and depressed.
> >
> This is also not correct and there might be a misunderstanding.
> A timeout was expected on Saturday. There were no observations and
> command stations tried to re-establish communication by sending
> blind commands.
> Assuming that no commands have been accepted by the IHU-1 since contact
> was lost on Wednesday, a COMMAND-ASSIST watchdog will be invoked
> at orbit=65, MA=0 which is 2000 Dec 21 [Thu] 23:55 utc.
> The COMMAND-ASSIST routine will cycle through various RX, TX, Hi-gain
> and Low-Gain antennas..
> If commands were received by the spacecraft (although we have not
> seen any successful commands so far), than the COMMAND-ASSIST watchdog
> will be reset for another 10 orbits. In this case we may see this function
> happen not before Dec 25.
> Please note that this is a *software* watchdog. There is no hardware
> watchdog. If the IHU has crashed, than a RESET command can be issued
> from ground. This would be the last resort. It is a very fail-safe
> system, which has been used before on AO-10 and AO-13.
> However, it was decided to check and analyze all other possibilities
> before issuing such a drastic command. There is no need to hurry and
> we don't want to miss any option...
> > >There are various serious reports about very weak PSK signals which
> > > seem to be coming from AO-40. The commandteam is verifiing these
> We also got reports that these signals might be "fake" PSK signals sent
> by someone through AO-10, which was visible at the same time.
> The command team is still very interested in any signal report, but please
> make sure that these signals come from the right direction, etc..
> 73s Peter DB2OS
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org