[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Link budgets??
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Link budgets??
- From: "John Stephensen, KD6OZH" <kd6ozh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:17:09 -0000
A second transceiver isn't really needed. There are general coverage
receivers from Yaesu, Icom and Kenwood that work through 2000 MHz and some
receive SSB.
John
KD6OZH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Langdon" <tlang@freeway.apana.org.au>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Saturday, 25 November 2000 13:55 UTC
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Link budgets??
>
> Hello Jim!
>
> 24 Nov 00 10:09, you wrote to Tony Langdon:
>
> JS> Backing up to an evolutionary approach, I'm seriously thinking about
> JS> some low UHF IF OUTSIDE the amateur bands, which has a couple of
> JS> advantages:
> JS> freedom from conflict with vhf or uhf uplink (important since
> JS> ao-40 supports any combination)
> JS> ability to choose relatively "quiet" frequencies
>
> The idea has some merits. The biggest problem for me is the expense of
yet
> another SSB rig, to work on the non standard IF, as none of the SSB rigs I
have
> are easily modifiable to non ham frequencies.
>
> JS> Some wild ideas for thought, for what it's worth.
>
> Worth playing with in any case.
>
> Tony, VK3JED
>
> .. Don't drink and park. Accidents cause people.
> --
> |Fidonet: Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18
> |Internet: tlang@freeway.apana.org.au
> |
> | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
>
>
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home