[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: digitial/non-digital debate

On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:10:04PM -0500, Jon Ogden wrote:
> My entire point is that just because a technology is old does not mean it
> should be abandoned!  This is true with consumer items as well.  Sure, they
> get improved, but if you techno-elitists think that technology itself is the
> answer, then why was Iridium a miserable failure?  It failed because even
> though it was "new" technology, it didn't have a PRACTICAL purpose.  Old
> technologies that still work that do not have COST EFFECTIVE new
> technologies to replace them still stay around.  Most folks are very
> utilitarian.  If it works, don't fix it.

You're mistaking old with obselete. Rocket boosters may be old,
but they are not obselete. (I'll have to take your word for it that
they're old, because I don't know anything about them.) SSB/CW/etc
are obselete in most applications, not just old.

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org