[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
RE: DSP Possibilities ?
- Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] DSP Possibilities ?
- From: "Howie DeFelice" <hdefelice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:20:22 -0400
I think your bits/hz calculations are with FEC. Uncoded QPSK would produce
2 bits/Hz, 8PSK without coding is 3 bits/Hz and 16QAM is 4 bits/Hz. This
would reduce the transmitted symbol rate to the data rate divided by the
number of bits/Hz. Of course, I can't imagine using these schemes on
amateur satellites (or any other satellites for that fact) without some
FEC.
I could be wrong, but I don't think changing the modulation effects the
sample rate for the modulator, but it does increase the work load from a
number crunching view. On the other hand, the demodulator's sampling rate
should be lower due to the decreased symbol rate. I would imagine that the
number crunching inside the demod would also increase. The net sum result
is that if you take some of the burden off the sample rate, you use up the
processing power somewhere else, and it's most likely NOT a linear
tradeoff...
Howie
AB2S
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home