[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: MicroWave: Re: Indium solder question from KA0RYT (EN34DW - MINN.)
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MicroWave: Re: Indium solder question from KA0RYT (EN34DW - MINN.)
- From: Clifford Buttschardt <cbuttsch@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 18:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20000919201859.00af2400@tiac.net>
Oh my Paul you have hit a nerve that is only hours old. I asked for some
Indium/Silver solder as we have a number of solar cells awaiting
construction in a satellite project. Unfortunately even with the
suggestion of a manufacturer, we distroyed the cells with 60/40 solder.
We need an answer! Not only is the connections between the cells
important but we need to know what Epoxy---non gassing type--- that will
work. So far, only the Indium solder has been suggested and nothing
regarding the "glue" need to fasten the cells to a satellite face been
suggested. The world has all kinds of suggestions but nothing specific
that we can tell students BUILDING a CUBESAT what to do! Cliff K7RR
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Paul Wade W1GHZ (N1BWT) & Beth Wade N1SAI wrote:
> I had lots of experience years ago with indium solder, ALL BAD!
> when I worked at Microwave Semiconductor, they used indium solder
> to assemble microwave amplifiers; they ended up replacing every one
> of them when the joints failed. they would come back with alumina
> (ceramic) circuit boards rattling around in the case.
>
> as I recall, there were two major problems:
>
> 1. gold and indium form an amalgam that is very brittle and perhaps
> somewhat porous.
>
> 2. the indium solder required a very active flux (read: ACID). since
> flux is never completely removed, any moisture that seeped in later
> would spread the acid around and finish off the joint.
>
> I recall reading a posting recently looking for a flux-free indium
> solder used for photocells. this would eliminate the second problem.
>
> however, the first problem is not so easy, and probably occurs with
> silver as well. I learned a lot about metallurgy and ceramics the
> hard way, and education is always expensive.
>
> so I'd recommend staying away from indium. ordinary solder works
> very well with copper, and silver solders are available with higher
> and lower melting points if you are trying to have more than one
> soldering temp.
>
> 73
> paul
>
>
> At 09:26 PM 9/18/00 EDT, you wrote:
> >Hello !! My name is Ron and I was directed to ask you for some info on your
> >experiences with the indium solder that W2DRZ was discussing on the VHF
> >reflector ....... I am considering trying with this solder for experimental
> >soldering on some 432 cavity input preamps . I have been constructing 432
> and
> >144 cavity input preamps for several years (please take a look at the
> Central
> >States noise figure results to see my "work") . I am curious if there are
> any
> >bad effects from using this type of solder on the copper pipe type cavitys
> >that I produce here ?? Any info would be appreciated - I am planning to
> >silver plate these too ........ 73 and tnx again , Ron Bergantzel KA0RYT
> >
> >
>
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home