[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: FO-20

Best treatise on FM so far!  There is absolutely no reason to consider FM
on any limited power budget amateur satellite.  As for the mothballing of
larger antenna arrays used for AO13 and AO10, I think more than fair to
ask those that were active to LOUDLY expound on how much better these
birds were using any mode whatever!  The lazy will soon get the idea..
Cliff K7RR

On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Walls, Jim R wrote:

> Jon Ogden - NA9D said (in part):
> ----------
> > The problem with the SSB birds is that
> > a.) Most of the SSB ops mothballed their stations after the
> > demise of AO-13.
> Certainly some did, but I'm sure that lots of "not operational" stations
> would require only a little effort to become "operational".  Thinks like
> some antenna / feed / rotor maintenance, taking equipment off the garage
> shelf and putting back in service, etc.
> > b.) The rest of the ham community thinks their too hard to
> > work (I did).
> I guess that means that anything more than "Order a dual band handheld from
> HRO and start talking" is too hard to do.  I certainly didn't think so.
> With the greatly increased number of HF radios coming out with 2M and 430
> all-mode capability, it's just not that hard to do.
> >c.) FM is the fashionable and politically correct mode to
> > promote right now.
> As to FM being PC, I think that's just a bunch of $%&*.  I think the better
> term might be LAZY.  It seems no one actually wants to put any effort into
> anything.  Regardless of the resultant gain (pleasure, satisfaction, etc),
> any amount of effort required is too much bother.  It's really disgusting
> I think using the FM satellites as an intro to satellites is fine and
> wonderful.  They are easy to get into.  Unfortunately not enough effort is
> made to tell prospective new users that it's not like operating your local
> repeater - IT IS A WEAK SIGNAL operation.  That part not withstanding, I
> still think that the FM satellites should be only the intro.  Now that you
> have seen that you really can use a satellite, move up to the LEO SSB birds.
> They are not that much harder, but you will have to learn a few more things,
> and you will likely need to spend some money at it, but the ability to
> ACTUALLY TALK to people for more than 10 seconds is worth something, isn't
> it?
> I think the biggest handicap right now is that the timing of the passes.
> Both FO-29 and FO-20 are making the nighttime passes in the middle of the
> night and daytime passes are in the middle of the work day (when many of us
> are working).  Both those birds do drift around the day so give it a year or
> so and they will be back to better pass times.  Both those birds work very
> well and it is too bad that they are not used more.
> 73
> -------------------------
> Jim Walls - K6CCC
> k6ccc@amsat.org
> http://home.earthlink.net/~k6ccc/
> Ofc:  626-302-8515    FAX:  626-302-9999
> AMSAT member 32537 / WSWSS member 395
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org