[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
RE: Satellite ATV (was...)
- Subject: [amsat-bb] RE: Satellite ATV (was...)
- From: "Walls, Jim R" <WALLSJR@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 15:16:34 -0700
Art Feller said:
> FYI: Here in the USA/FCC's Laboratory Division, back in the 1940's,
> analog FM television was tested along with AM/VSB with both using
> 6 MHz channels. FM worked quite well. Indeed, to my eye reviewing
> the photographs from receivers of the day, FM worked better than
> AM/VSB.
> I'm still not sure why AM/VSB was chosen. Curious.
> Anyway, it's a tidbit from history. Hope you find it interesting.
6 MHz is REALLY narrow band for FM TV. What is considered "Narrow band" FM
TV is 4 MHz deviation which results in a 17 MHz wide channel. This does
result in a picture that is better than AM/VSB. Wide band TV is 11 MHz
deviation and uses a 40 MHz wide channel - this is what C-Band analog
satellite TV uses.
73
-------------------------
Jim Walls - K6CCC
k6ccc@amsat.org
http://home.earthlink.net/~k6ccc/
Ofc: 626-302-8515 FAX: 626-302-9999
AMSAT member 32537 / WSWSS member 395
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home