[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Magnetic Field Stabalization
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Magnetic Field Stabalization
- From: alf sauve <alf.sauve@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 06:40:03 -0400
> letting it be random.
Random? How about this hypothesis? When a satellite is released it
acquires certain angular momentum's in each of it's three axis's (is there a
plural to axis?). These momentum's, or tumbling, once established would
continue on in a very predictable, not random, pattern unless some external
force acted upon the satellite to alter these momentum's. Re-stated,
wouldn't a body tumbling continue to tumble in the same way unless acted
upon by an external force?
If so then your fears of a momentary period of stabilization would be
unfounded.
However, from a perspective of trying to receive signals I would vote for
stabilization of the antennas so that the polarization remained fairly
constant during a pass. Or at least changed slowly.
But of course, realize I'm just a poor accountant with no formal training in
space travel and I've never been higher than 45,000'.
Alf - W4ADS
================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Bruninga" <bruninga@nadn.navy.mil>
To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 11:25 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Magnetic Field Stabalization
> Satellite Designers,
>
> I had wanted to add bar magnets to our satellite (a cube) to give us a
> predictable oreintation. The alternative is nothing and just letting it
> be random. I dont like this. since I fear it could stay in one
> orientation for long periods and overheat on one side.
>
> The proponent of this laisse faire approach says that if you wanted to
> keep it oriented one way, you couldnt, so he concludes that it will
> therefore always be moving. But he cannot tell me how much.
>
> Where is the best report on the spin/tumble of the microsats and even
> better, how can I prove to this person that there is a risk of temporary
> stabilities that can overheat one side. Or are my fears unfounded and
> random forces will assure even heating of a 10 inch symetric cube with
> only a few asymetric tape measure whips?
>
> de WB4APR, Bob
>
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home