Re: [amsat-bb] 1200/9600 Baud REAL test

[Bob Bruninga <bruninga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Jon Ogden wrote:

> > P.S.  It also shows HOW TERRIBLE MOST ON AIR 1200 BAUD SIGNALS ARE.  Many
> > digipeaters and most all users stations I see take DEAD FULL QUIETING
> > signals before they can be doecoded, simply because they were never
> > adjsuted properly...
> 
> I don't disagree with you about bad deviation being out there.  But if a
> KPC-3+ can decode a signal and a TH-D7A can't decode effectively the same
> signal, then there is something wrong in the D7's TNC.

I would welcome such a comparable test.  It would be another good data
point. Hook up your KPC-3+ to a THD7 and see how it receives another
THD7.  My tests showed that the THD7 could copy another THD7 with
only one LCD segment lit.  (less than -117 dBm).  THats an awfully weak
signal for AFSK.

bob


----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org