[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Fw: Stop Your Whining Already! Re: Satellite FIeld Day!
- Subject: Re: Fw: Stop Your Whining Already! Re: [amsat-bb] Satellite FIeld Day!
- From: "Dennis Morris" <denmorr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:56:35 -0400
Franklin:
I didn't guess - I asked. One of the mega-stations was running 100 watts
into an 18 foot 2 meter boomer.
73,
Dennis Morris
WA4ZJJ
----- Original Message -----
From: Franklin Antonio <antonio@qualcomm.com>
To: Glenn Little <glittle@awod.com>
Cc: Dennis Morris <denmorr@bellsouth.net>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org>;
<kk5yy@arrl.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Stop Your Whining Already! Re: [amsat-bb] Satellite FIeld
Day!
> At 09:11 AM 7/6/2000 -0400, Glenn Little wrote:
> >...then the big gun comes on to monopolize the satellite with enough
power
> >to fully caopture the bird from the one attempting a contact with lower
> >power. I think that the FCC rules still state...
>
> Nonsense.
>
> FM transponders fundamentally only let one guy in at a time, and the
> physics dictates that its the guy with the highest signal level. Even if
> everyone were working with exactly the same EIRP, distance differences
> would still produce tremendous power level differences at the satellite,
> and at any given time one station would still have a substantial signal
> level advantage over another.
>
> FM transponders simply aren't designed to let a lot of people communicate
> at once. Therefore, they aren't much good in an emergency, and aren't
easy
> to use in a contest. If you expected something else, you had incorrect
> expectations.
>
> You and others have been piling on complaining about "big gun" stations,
> claiming that they ran hugely excess power, but I contend that you have no
> way to determine how much power they were running, or to what degree it
was
> in excess. That's the nature of an FM transponder.
>
> I suggest that next field day you consider the nature of the satellite you
> are trying to use. If you want to use a transponder that is designed to
be
> shared by a large number of people, then choose a satellite with a linear
> transponder instead of an FM one.
>
> I also suggest that in a real emergency you need margin against unforseen
> circumstances and the bedlam created by the real emergency and in a
contest
> you need margin against the bedlam created by competition. In that sense,
> the contest accurately simulates difficult emergency conditions. Sounds
> like you just weren't up to the challenge.
>
> It is also important to understand that a contest is "a contest". That
> means you try to get more points than other folks. If you want polite
> operating conditions, you might want to operate on a different day. If
> you're sailing in the America's cup, expect to have the other boat cut
> between you and the wind. They call that strategy. Similarly, I can't
> fault someone for following the rules and trying to get as many contacts
> (ie points) as possible on field day.
>
> Someone suggested a rule change to limit the number of points one could
get
> on an FM satellite. I think that's a reasonable idea. Of course, in a
> real emergency, there won't be any such "rules".
>
>
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home