[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Oscar 0
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Scott E. Olitsky wrote:
> It would be interesting to do the calculations on this. The path loss for
> EME is somewhere on the order of -250 dB. Much of this loss is related to
> the fact that the moon is a very poor reflector and only 6.5% of the signal
> that hits the moon is returned to us. A transponder should would return
> more than that so the path loss would be significantly less.
That is forgetting one thing. ALthough the moon is only 6% effective as a
reflector, its Antenna is several thousand square miles. Your antennas on
the moon will only be a few feet, and so they will receive millionths of
the transmitted power from earth. If I were to guess, I would say that it
will take a 13 dB (long 2m yagi) and 1000 watts to be heard on a moon
receiver if it only has an omni antenna (rover). But the rover then has
to also have 1000 watts to get back, OR a larger antenna.
Good luck
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home