[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
RE: Pirate problem on FM satellites, minor problem
- Subject: [amsat-bb] RE: Pirate problem on FM satellites, minor problem
- From: Tony Langdon <tlangdon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:57:31 +1000
> The pirate stations randomly heard on FM and SSB satellites
> are usually just people operating simplex FM mobile radios
> in the satellite uplink part of the band.
Had a few of those. Local hams who are heard on the uplink are contacted
and informed of the problem, upon which time, they usually apologise for
their mistake and and QSY.
> These stations are a combination of legimate licensed
> radio operators and some illegal operators and taxi operations.
> The legal operators are just not following the suggested
> gentleman's agreements and in those cases when they discover
> their error they will usually comply.
Indeed, it's a rare legal station who won't QSO, once the situation has been
explained to them in a reasonable manner.
> The illegal stations are only a minor problem for satellites for the
> following reasons.
>
> 1. Satellite uplink usually requires a significant uplink ERP for
> proper operations (FM and SSB). The Illegal stations or pirates
Hmm, this is not quite correct for the FM birds. UO-14 requires 0.25W into
a 5/8 antenna to get a reasonable signal for elevations over 15-20 degrees,
and 2W into the same 5/8 for elevations over 5 degrees. 25W into a typical
base station collinear will hit the bird pretty hard, pracctically down to
the horizon.
Yes, I have done QRP tests on UO-14, and regularly operate QRP portable.
> are usually a mobile FM transceiver, running 50 watts or less into
> a mobile antenna with a gain of 0 dbd or less (typical ERP 25-20
> watts).
Which will put a respectable signal into UO-14.
> A satellite station with a directional antenna will easily over power
> the weak pirate mobile signals on most occasions.
Still takes a bit of power. It's not a case of a "weak pirate station", but
massed stations, many of them quite strong, which basically precludes QRP
operation from about a minute after the first stations get into the
footprint of the bird.
> 2. Orbit path:
> The orbit path, foot print and speed of the satellite will
> usually take
> the satellite quickly
> into and out of the pirate area quickly. If u do hear a
> pirate station,
> his
> mobile radio will quickly fade in a minute or two. If you
Again, not with massed pirate stations. Passes over Western Australia are
typically affected for over 5 minutes, when seen from Melbourne. For
ascending passes, it is the last 5+ minutes that's affected, for descending
passes, the first 5+ mins.
> have a AZ/EL
> gain
> antenna system, again your signal should usually over power the random
> pirate stations.
And a truckload of power...
> How can you compensate for pirate QRM.
> Simple, install the biggest az/el antennas system you can afford.
> And have plenty of reserve capacity for the satellites you plan on
> using.
> As always, only use the minimum power required for the desired
> communications
> and follow the suggested ERP uplink ratings for that specific
> satellite.
If you want to forget QRP portable operation, or keep satellites to those
who can put up huge antenna arrays (that would upset the landlady just a
tad! :) She's been pretty good, but there are limits ;) ).
Any other VKs, or people to the north want to comment on the situation in
this area?
My main point. It's a significant problem because communications are
completely disrupted everytime the bird passes to the north-west of
Australia, not merely a minor annoyance that can be dealt with by a little
bit of antenna gain.
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home