[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: 9913fx vs LMR400UF
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 9913fx vs LMR400UF
- From: K1uxbMa@xxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 12:06:40 EST
In a message dated 3/31/00 12:11:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
monteira@cisco.com writes:
<< A few comments on LMR vs 9913:
From an RF performance standpoint they are virtually
identical (spec wise - but 9913 may or may not meet spec!)
The jacket on the LMR-400 cable is polypropylene rather
then PVC (on 9913) so LMR will not out-gas and damage
the inner dielectric over time. You can expect longer life
from LMR-400 >>
Hi Tony;
Just a few more comments on your message to Bob;
I'm assuming your referring to LMR-400 not LMR-400-UF since the loss on
400-UF is greater @ 450Mc. Also curious to me is the fact LMR-400 is solid
copper clad Aluminum,On the other hand LMR-400-UF is stranded bare
copper.
Nick_K1uxb@Amsat.Org
AmSat M#22708 ARRL M#
Save_Time Go_Online
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home