[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Icom 706
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Icom 706
- From: Lee810@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 09:02:48 EST
In a message dated 3/23/00 9:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time, tiptond@psi.com
writes:
> Now... With all the fuss about the full duplex issue... I own several 2M
> FM rigs. My primary interest is in the AO27 bird and working the FM
> Repeator type birds. I can do this effectively with the 706's 70cm side
> (Which has a hell of a lot better tuning than my HT) and a 2M Mobile rig.
I made a lot of contacts on AO27 using an Arrow and an FT50 which is not a
full duplex HT. However, after I got a full duplex HT (an FT51) I would
never go back. There are simply too many opportunities to get stepped on
while using the FM birds and I know that when I hear others getting in while
I'm trying to respond that I must try again.
Secondly, a mobile rig with a vertical antenna makes a horrible combination
for AO27. You will miss a lot of calls because you'll only hear the downlink
periodically, but your 50W will be stomping on others who can hear the
downlink and you'll make yourself quite unpopular in a hurry. Also, using an
Arrow handheld antenna with a rig mounted on your console will be difficult
to tune while steering the antenna (i.e., one arm needs to be outside the car
and the other arm inside the car). You're right that the tuning on the 706
will be more precise, but you'll also find that the 5kHz steps for the
Doppler correction on an HT is not a serious drawback on FM birds.
73,
Lee Devlin, KØLEE (K0LEE)
Greeley, CO
http://members.aol.com/lee810/ham.html
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home