[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
RE: Icom 706
Ok, here's a thought. My principal reason for wanting the smaller rig is
for travel. That said, it's looking like I will go with the 706 for now.
Now... With all the fuss about the full duplex issue... I own several 2M
FM rigs. My primary interest is in the AO27 bird and working the FM
Repeator type birds. I can do this effectively with the 706's 70cm side
(Which has a hell of a lot better tuning than my HT) and a 2M Mobile rig.
Is *THIS* a solution that will keep me out of the Wolfhong (SP?) hall of
fame with you guys??
SInce my other interests are in HF, VHf Terrestrial, I think this is a
good solution.
I may regret this.. But, Comments??
Dave
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Tony Langdon wrote:
> > Geesh, seems that the Icoms have it, however, I'm wondering
> > why people seem
> > so opposed to these two rigs. They are cost effective and
> > relatively full
> > featured. I don't wanna spend the extra $400 for 847 right
> > now, though it's
> > not being precluded from future consideration. Right now though, the
> > portability is a very serious concern as I travel almost perpetually.
>
> I can't be 100% sure, but from what I've seen, the 706IIG can't operate
> crossband full duplex like the 847, so that can make it limiting for
> satellite work.
>
> Either that or the person I know with one needs a few pointers on getting it
> to go full duplex :)
>
> I have no idea on the FT 100, never even seen one close up.
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home