[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Uni_Trac and Windows 2000

Hi All,

Normally I do not get involved with this kind of controversies.  If an
amateur develops something for good of everyone, such as Dave Lamont has
done,  I see no reason why he should not fine tune it, or  otherwise fix
the bugs that are brought to his attention,   or keep it updated. I find
this forum extremely useful than searching all over the place for updates.
I bought one unit and have been keen to know what could be done to improve
its performance.  As far as I know, Dave Lamont  was not interested in any
commercial proposition when he was offered one.

>From time to time I see members wanting to sell something surplus to their
requirements.  What is the harm in that? If something new is available and
members inform on the net, would they be advertising ICOM, Kenwood etc. for
their new rigs. I am interested to know what new rig has replaced the IC
821H etc. Where else could I find this kind of useful information, or when
new products are available.

Let's not become proctorial and enjoy our hobby. Tell us all about the
newer and better stuff that is available. These are just my thoughts. I
mean no harm to anyone.

Sangat, 9M2SS 



At 08:33 16/02/00 -0500, John Morley wrote:
>Hi All,
>Can someone tell me what the guidelines are for posting messages to the
>AMSAT reflector with an overt, or otherwise, commercial content?  As a
>matter of fairness, I do not think that posts of this type belong on the
>reflector. In my opinion, this is not the place that businesses should be
>cultivating new sales with product announcements, or notifying existing
>customers of product enhancements. If that is the intent, wouldn't it be
>more equitable to put an ad in the AMSAT journal, or promote these
>products/enhancements via the web. Before you disagree, think of what the
>reflector would be like if all amateur satellite related businesses
>regularly posted messages of this type.
>John KA1JMF
>At 06:34 AM 3/22/00 +0000, you wrote:
>>I have just completed an evaluation of Windows 2000 Professional
>>to verify the action of my Uni_Trac satellite tracking system.
>>My system works without any software or hardware changes
>>in its stand alone mode.
>>When used in conjuction with the DDE connections of Nova 
>>for Windows 2.0w, the latest releases of Wisp, and WinOrbit,
>>all the above 3 programs operate correctly. I have not done
>>an in depth evaluation of every feature of the associated
>>The evaluation was under duress somewhat. The test bed was
>>a Pentium 166 Mhz laptop with 48 MBytes of ram. Microsoft
>>calls for a minimum of 64 MBytes. However despite some
>>additional evidence of the swap to hard disk activity the programs
>>ran concurrently with copies of the Visual Basic 6 IDE, and a 
>>copy of Word6 with no viisual evidence of delay  .
>>I will have to supply a slightly different port driver than I do
>>now for NT4 it seems. This is of course included free of charge
>>on the Uni_Trac distribution CD.
>>Dave Lamont      ZL2AMD         www.qsl.net/zl2amd/
>>Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
>>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org