[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: threat to 2.4 GHz.?

Hello Laura.

08 Mar 00 09:16, you wrote to ALL:

 LH> @   for <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:14:05 -0500 (EST)
 LH> This is (or should be) a non-issue. All our interesting
 LH> allocations are shared, and rather than fretting about it,
 LH> we should be looking at creative ways of coexisting
 LH> with our band-mates. If this makes the traditional narrow-
 LH> band modes obsolete, so be it. Just because they have
 LH> been useful in the past does not mean that they must be
 LH> useful in perpetuity...

Every threat is also an opportunity.  And I've been looking at the wireless
gear for its potential ham uses.  Most of it is still a bit expensive, but
that's likely to change soon enough. :-)

 LH> We should welcome manufacturers making products for these
 LH> bands, because that means we have cheap parts available
 LH> to play with.



.. iums melt in your PC, not in your hand!
|Fidonet:  Tony Langdon 3:633/284.18
|Internet: tlang@freeway.apana.org.au
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org