[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: HF vs. Sats


> >From: "Dave D'Epagnier" <DAVED@ctilidar.com>
> >I'm using HF these days primarily as a means to keep in contact with >my
> >sister in law who is a doctor in Malawi. Her village has no >telephones.
> >Her hospital has a solar powered mobile hf rig and a >tower with a
> >tri-bander on it. The gear was all donated. They use 40m >to communicate
> >with people in the capitol city. They also use 10m and >15m to
> >with me and a doctor here in the us to coordinated >medical supplies and
> >keep in contact with families. So for now, hf >is still their lifeline to
> >the states. Someday they'll get better >equipment for sure (like a phone
> >line >and internet), but for now >they take hf very seriously.
> >
> Ever hear of KISS?  Keep It Simple Stupid.  This is HF.
> HF is inexpensive (compared to satellite equipment), and has little
> recurring costs (equipment maintenance only).  But, the trade off is
> that availability is unstable, the quality of audio and/or data and
> data rate isn't as good. HF is less usuable for DX during solar minimums.
> (From a military or commercial standpoint this isn't as
> important than it is for hams.  Most military and many commercial uses are
> NVIS, short range, just over the horizon)
> Sats are more reliable, when they work (human factors), for communication,
> and allow wider band transmissions to be passed.
> Both satellite and HF have their place in ham radio.
> What we ought to be doing with HF is developing better data modems
> (PSK31, MT63 are a *great* start).  Systems like HAM ALE would also
> be a great project to get running....
> What we ought to be doing with SATS are developing high speed doppler
> resistant data (yes, even wideband and spread-spectrum stuff).  With the
> proliferation of computers, any analog data can be encoded and passed
> digitally.
> There is plenty to invent, develop and improve with both sats and HF.
> I'm presently very interested in trying to advance the state of the
> art on HF, as some of the newer modems and coding techniques will
> allow fairly high speed robust data to be passed on HF.  I can assure
> you it is starting to happen commercially.
> 73,
> Fred W0FMS

Fred, try this link for Ham HF ALE and NVIS
 There are a few of us experimenting with using ALE for RACES and SHARES
nets.   I'll have to agree when it comes to simplicity, cost, and having to
deal with no supporting infrastructure or the lost of infrastructure, HF is
the way to fly.

Dudley  KK7IF

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org