[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Picosat heard? [was: "StenSat may be Released ThisMorning..."]
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Picosat heard? [was: "StenSat may be Released ThisMorning..."]
- From: "Jean-L. RAULT" <f6agr@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2000 19:13:36 +0100
Jamie
No picosats on 437.100 tonite at 17:29 UTC on 06 jan 00 over Paris, France .
OPAL is alone around the freq and still answering with a 2810 Hz answer to
our connection attempts.
73 de Jean-Louis F6AGR
be Released ThisMorning..."]
>
>
> This morning at 05:40 PST, we attempted to launch picosatellites.
> As many of you have heard, Opal's transmitter has developed a spurious
> audio signal around 2800Hz that is corrupting the downlink. We are
> unable to decode any packets. However, it is transmitting. There
> are two beacons:
>
> 1) Short pulse every ten seconds.
> 2) Longer pulse approximately every minute.
>
> Unfortunately, Opal may sound similar to JAK so listen carefully. Due
> to unknown reasons, Artemis chose to use the same frequency as us.
>
> Opal appears to be receiving appropriately. It distinctly attempts to
> respond to connects but we cannot decode them. So, we are attempting to
> fake Opal's response with our prototype Opal and in doing so, fake out
> our ground station into thinking it is connected. Thus our prototype
> will provide the acks that our ground station needs. Preliminary testing
> shows this works, and we're doing more testing now to confirm.
>
> So, there may be a possibility they launched this morning. We have
> no way of knowing other than Picosat monitoring.
>
> Keep your ears open and let us know if you hear anything. We'll be
> trying/listening again this evening.
>
> --Jamie
> jwc@stanford.edu
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, John Mock wrote:
>
> > It sounds like at least one picosat was released. Or, at least, there's
> > now something out there ca. 1530 this morning beeping on 437.090
[437.100
> > before doppler], perhaps in slow MCW. I didn't get much of it, as i did
> > not get outside until MEL and was looking mostly for STENSAT. It seems
> > so slow and the spacing so large so long that i can hardly do more than
> > distinguish dots from the one dash that i heard. After replaying the ta
pe
> > several times, this is the best i could get without resorting to an
audio
> > spectragram:
> >
> > ... ... . . .. - . . . . .
> >
> > I suppose it might have been trying to say 'artimis' but that is
probably
> > a long shot... Sorry, no S-meter reading, but clearly audible above the
> > noise with an Arrow-equivalent antenna.
> >
> > I didn't hear anything on 436.620 [436.625 before doppler], but they had
> > expected it would take 1-2 hours of illumination before STENSAT would
> > start transmitting, especially if it was only getting sunlight edge-on.
> > Unless someone else did better than i (more sensitive receiver, or full
> > az-el antenna setup instead of Arrow-equivalent), then Europe or the
> > East Coast is likely to hear it first.
> >
> > -- KD6PAG (Networking Old-Timer, Satellite QRPer)
> > ----
> > Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
> >
>
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home