[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Coax
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Coax
- From: K5OE@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 16:47:50 EDT
Steve, Robert,
The decision to put the preamp(s) at the antenna is always the right one.
Even a mediocre preamp will improve the system noise figure if there is more
than 1 or 2 dB loss in the feedline.
Your comments about using less expensive (and higher loss) coax after the
preamp is sensible, but only for a single-mode station. If you run only mode
J (V/U), then you could put even something like RG-8X after the 70 cm preamp
with an insignificant difference at the receiver. If you use the same
antennas to work mode B (U/V), however, then the losses on the cheaper coax
are unacceptable for the 70 cm uplink. This same scenario applies to the 2 m
side as well, only the losses may be slightly more tolerable. I recommend
you put up the best coax you can afford and is practical for the
installation.
I ran 9913F (Cablexperts) to my antennas, but if I had to do it over again, I
would run hard-line with only a jumper section of 9913F around the rotor. I
was lucky enough to win 25 m of Aircom Plus at the AMSAT convention (thanks
SSB) and plan to use it for my P3D antenna run. It's specs are in-between
hard-line and 9913, but appears to be able to take a standard N connector.
The connectors for hard-line will cost you about as much as a used car :-))
73,
Jerry, K5OE
> > I'm just getting started in satellite work. I traded in all my old
> -> junky radios for a bright shiny new FT-847. I've got antenna ideas
> -> and some parts scouted out. Now for coax.
> ->
> -> I understand the need for low loss coax. There are a number of
> -> choices: 9913F, LMR400, Aircell and others. Are there good reasons to
> -> choose one over the other? Any advice from the old hands to an utter
> -> newbie?
> ->
> -> Robert Rice
> -> WB5PKN
>
> This is a good discussion point. Robert, I went through the same
> decision process about a year ago when I was putting up my tower and
> satellite antenna array. I have a 72 foot tower with 2/70 beams on top,
> along with several antennas. I ran "Buryflex" down the tower (from The
> Wireman) to my junction/grounding box, then LMR400 underground in
> conduit over to the edge of the house.
>
> The key thing that now makes me reconsider the wisdom of using very low
> loss feedline is that I also mounted preamps right at the sat. beam
> antennas for best recieve performance. After using the setup for a year
> or so, it seems that the preamps make SO much difference, that I don't
> operate without them. If that is the case, then the low loss aspect of
> my feedline doesn't matter as much, because all that really matters now
> is the loss of signal between the antenna and the preamp. The preamp
> itself has enough output signal that RG213 would have done the job just
> fine. Get the drift here? I think if I had it all to do over again, I
> would just buy the best preamps I could find and use average loss
> feedline. This thinking doesn't apply for antenna setups without
> preamps.
>
> Comments from hams with similar setups would be appreciated.
>
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home